Friday, 24 March 2017

The lone battle of a Gandhiwaadi to bring Swacchta at Bapu’s memorial

Last year on 30th November, Supreme Court gave an order mandating the nation anthem should be played before screening films in theatres. And the person who fought the matter legally is a Bhopal based social activist Shyam Narayan Chouksey.

But winning that battle was not enough to cheer Mr. Chouksey patriotism. Now he is battling up with another issue on which almost every Indian will provide support to Mr. Chouksey, 77, who retired as an engineer with the Central Warehousing Corporation in 2000. This time he has filed a PIL in Delhi Highcourt against the irregularities which has caused Mahatma Gandhi’s memorial ‘Rajghat’ to remain in bad conditions.  

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who himself hails from Mahatma Gandhi’s land of Gujarat is singing songs of Swacch Bharat but his own government has failed to keep the memorial of ‘Father of nation’ in good condition. According to an RTI, over Rs 4 crores are being spent on the maintenance of Rajghat annually, still things are not at place there.

Entering Bapu’s memorial Rajghat makes the petitioner SN Chouksey, angry as all he sees there is cigarette sticks, damaged wooden pieces, broken tiles, cracked taps, plastic wrappers and dirty toilets which in turn become breeding place for mosquitoes. He has also found that the white marble closer to the monument has gone black due to lack of cleaning and the green carpet has got damaged. In his own words “Bapu used to tell that Swacchta cleanliness is more important than Swadhinta (Independence) but his own Samadhi is craving for that. Where is the allocated money going?” He is also not happy with keeping a donation box near to Mahatma’s Samadhi.

In the petition filed through advocates Abhinav Shrivastava and Sameer Jain, Chouksey submitted photos of the various deficiencies that he had come across when he had visited the monument in past few years, when he claims the situation had worsened. 

He sought directions to MoUD to "stringently apply principles of cleanliness and sanitation at the Rajghat Samadhi, failing which the Ministry should be held liable and penalised for the same and to issue strict instructions to the President and Secretary of the Rajghat Samadhi Committee to perform their duties strictly as provided under the Act and Rules and to make the Rajghat Samadhi a world class monument".

The petition has also sought directions to the Rajghat Samadhi Committee "to carry out repair and maintenance work. To ensure proper maintenance and upkeep of the Samadhi a mechanism should be evolved by MoUD so that once the things are set right at the Samadhi similar situation should not develop again in future. For this, the government may form an independent committee of experts such as civil engineer, public health engineer, expert from horticulture department and expert in Gandhian philosophy."

According to him, he has fought for 11 long years to make sure National Anthem being played in movie theatres and he will not stop until the holy place gets its glory back. So far, in total 6 hearings has been happened at Delhi Highcourt over the same matter and he is hopeful that it won’t take too long to reach out to a conclusion, unlike before. Mr. Chouksey used to visit Rajghat thrice a year, he captures pictures there and submit the same in court.
Being a Gandhiwaadi, cleanliness always remain in his priority list and he believes one day India will become clean as Bapu wished for long ago.

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

आओ नया हिन्दोस्तां बनायें ...

आओ नया हिन्दोस्तां बनायें,
हिन्दू ख्वाजा दर जाएँ
मुसलमां गंगा नहायें
दोनों मिल बैठकर गायें
आओ नया हिन्दोस्तां बनायें|

कभी मैं उनके घर खाने जाऊं
कभी वो मेरे जीमण आयें
मिलबांटकर पान खाएं
आओ नया हिन्दोस्तां बनायें|

मैं कुरान की आयतों में रम जाऊं
वो गीता का पाठ पढाये
मिल बैठकर सार समझाएं
आओ नया हिन्दोस्तां बनायें|

मैं दिवाली पे उन्हें बुलाऊं
ईद पे उनके घर जाऊं
दोनों मिलकर होली रंग लगाये
आओ नया हिन्दोस्तां बनायें|

मैं हरा पहन जम जाऊं
उनको भी भगवा पहनाऊं
रंगों का ये भेद मिटायें
आओ नया हिन्दोस्तां बनायें|

मैं गीतों की माला बनाऊं
वो संगीत से उसे सजाएँ
मिलकर दोनों गाना गायें
आओ नया हिन्दोस्तां बनायें|

The Division of Uttar Pradesh Into four States: A Forgotten Issue

Back in 2012, during last Assembly Elections of India’s largest state, Uttar Pradesh, one of the top trending issue which was doing rounds was of division of state into four different states. Then chief minister of state and BSP Supremo even passed a resolution in Assembly in 2011 to split UP into four smaller states - Purvanchal, Bundelkhand, Awadh Pradesh and Paschim Pradesh in the interest of providing better administration. Later, it got stuck with Central Government ruled by Congress.

It was believed to be a populist move with which Mayawati thought will benefit BSP in elections but people gave Samajwadi Party, which was against the split, a massive majority and since then no party has dared to raise the issue. With Uttar Pradesh going to polls again, the issue related to split of state is almost dead now. Neither political parties nor people of state are talking about new states anymore.

As far as history is concerned, the state constitutes of several provinces which was called The United Provinces of Agra and Oudh which was shortened by the Government of India Act 1935 to United Provinces and then came the name Uttar Pradesh as province word doesn’t fit with the idea of Repubic.

Later in 2001, the first division happened when the NDA government which was ruling India created a separate state of Uttaranchal (renamed Uttarakhand).

The administrative challenge of governing a state as big as UP, cannot be over-stated. With 18 Administrative Divisions, 75 districts, and more than one lakh villages, Uttar Pradesh is the 5th largest state in India by area and the largest state by population. If it was made an independent country, it would be 5th largest in the world by population, after Indonesia.

UP is endowed with vast natural resources more than any other state in India. The alluvial plains along the rivers happen to be one of the richest natural gifts to the people (many empires of ancient India flourished in Uttar Pradesh). With fertile land, natural water resources, rich culture and an authoritative presence, in books of history- Uttar Pradesh (UP) has everything that an administrative unit needs, to write its growth story. But with such huge population & land area it becomes difficult for the government to concentrate on the particular area of development.

The argument that smaller states accelerate the pace of development can be debated but it appears to be largely a political idea. The BJP’s Election Manifesto for the Lok Sabha polls of 2014, in a section under “Strengthen the Framework”, emphasises the party’s recognition of regional aspirations and builds a case for greater decentralisation through smaller states. The BJP never misses a chance to take credit of creating the states of Jharkhand, Uttarakhand and Chhatssigarh during NDA-I. But this time, party is silent and so as BSP which passed a resolution back in 2011 to divide UP into four different states.

It is believed that Mayawati was the first politician who come up with the idea of splitting UP into smaller administrative units. But that’s not true, In 1955, Ambedkar in his book ‘Thoughts On Linguistic States’, proposed the idea of UP being split into three states with the Western Region having Meerut as its capital, the Eastern Region having Allahabad at its capital and the Central region with Kanpur as its Capital. Following the same theory, later in 2011, then BSP government decided to divide the state into 4 parts. According to Mayawati's blueprint, Purvanchal will have 22 eastern districts of the state including Gorakhpur. Lucknow, the capital, would be a part of Awadh Pradesh. Bundelkhand has seven districts; Paschim Pradesh or Harit Pradesh would include Meerut and Ghaziabad.

As far as UP’s growth is concerned, the state lacks badly in economic development and social development indicators are equally disappointing. According to a study by Reserve Bank of India (2013), with a total of 29.43% poor (BPL estimates), UP sits at the 20th position overall, way below the All India average of 21.92% (based on MRP consumption). According to Census (2011), only 27.3% people have access to tap water, and a depressing 35.7% have access to toilets, both well below the national average of 43.5%, and 46.9% respectively. Regionally, Pashchimanchal looks economically prosperous, Purvanchal and Awadh are the dawdler and Bundelkhand, including the area comes under Madhya Pradesh, one can see India of 1950s.

Generally, there is a perception that smaller states are easier to manage compared to larger states but if we look at the Per Capita GDP or GDP growth rates for each of the Indian states, there is hardly any correlation between the growth rate and size of these states and is mostly dependent on Government policies and other factors. Other issues which go against the division of state are cost of infrastructure which will huge if new states get created, reduced self-sustainability which will adversely affect the Bundelkhand region because of lack of resources in that area and also, it hurts the very idea of unity in Diversity.


The Government should consider setting up a State Reorganization Committee specifically tasked at the division of Uttar Pradesh into smaller states. The previous decisions on creating new states have been taken under political pressures, but the situation demands that the government needs to handle the issue by better political governance, fiscal management and rule of law. Regionalism, sectarianism and casteism are a major deterrent to a united India and the idea of dividing a state based on these factors is certainly not welcome.

Note: This article was first published in The Quint.

Why BJP is no more 'The Party with a Difference'

"Party with a Difference" — this tagline still features on Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP’s) website. Though it’s really tough to spot the difference. With Amit Shah as its president, BJP has become the world's largest party, according to its website, whose membership programme has often come into question.
In May 2014, when the BJP came to power with unprecedented majority and Narendra Modi was elected prime minister, it was expected that things would change and "The Party with a Difference" will work in a way ordinary citizens start observing the change.
Sadly, no such difference is visible despite the government completing two years and nine months in office.
Dynastic politics
The BJP has always accused the Congress, India’s oldest political party, of indulging in dynastic politics, but now it seems the ruling party is no different.
Most of BJP’s young MPs are in office because of the political weight of their parents and kin. Few such brand ambassadors of dynastic politics in the ruling party are Anurag Thakur (son of former CM of Himachal Pradesh Prem Singh Dhumal), Dushyant Singh (son of Rajasthan CM Vasundhara Raje, who is a daughter of late MP Vijaya Raje Scindia), Preetam Munde (daughter of Late Gopinath Munde, a stalwart of BJP's Maharashtra unit), Poonam Mahajan (daughter of late BJP minister Pramod Mahajan), Jayant Sinha (son of veteran BJP leader Yashwant Sinha), Abhishek Singh (son of Chattisgarh CM Raman Singh), Varun Gandhi (son of Maneka Gandhi and grandson of late prime minister and Congress leader Indira Gandhi) and power minister Piyush Goyal (son of late BJP minister Ved Prakash Goyal).
The list goes on when you dig deep into state-level political affairs.
Significantly, most of the coalition partners of the BJP, including PDP, Shiv Sena, Akali Dal and Apna Dal but BJP follow suit, but no sin in joining hands with them.If one goes through the party’s candidate list for the ongoing Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, it becomes apparent that the "anti-dynasty" party has given around 60 tickets to politicians' children — the highest among all parties fighting elections.
Free for all
It won’t be wrong to say that the BJP, led by the Modi-Shah duo, has become the "Ganga" of politics where everyone, despite differences in ideology, criminal background and corruption allegations, are allowed to bathe in the saffron waters.
Well before the 2014 general elections, several opportunistic politicians joined the BJP, got tickets and few of them even got the ministerial berths in the Modi government. This happened in a party which takes pride in calling itself cadre-based. 


A recent excellent demonstration of this form of politics was observed in UP and Uttarakhand where many heavyweights took a holy dip in saffron sea. One of the gems being Vijay Bahuguna, former CM of Uttarakhand, who was accused of corruption during the Kedarnath crisis by none other than BJP itself. All his sins have been washed away in Assembly elections 2017.
Swami Prasad Maurya is another example. He joined the BJP and managed to get an MLA ticket for himself as well as his son. He is joined by the likes of Yashpal Arya, Rita Bahuguna Joshi and Ravi Kishan.
Today's BJP, led by second-generation leaders, has demonstrated a new way to grab power. The model was first implemented at Arunachal Pradesh, where party has been successful in breaking the PPA government and managed to form its government by borrowing 33 MLAs from, guess who, the PPA!
The saffron party tried the same tactics to seize power in Uttarakhand, but Supreme Court intervened and the Congress government led by Harish Rawat was able to complete its tenure.
Nagaland too is seems to be on the verge of getting a BJP government. Political observers have remained clueless about how such model of acquiring power will help the world’s largest party take voters into confidence and push forward its ideology.
Governance policies
Both UPA and NDA follow the same path when it comes to environment clearance. PM Modi openly mocks Congress for launching a scheme like MNREGA by terming it a monument of the grand old party’s failure, but allots Rs 48,000 crore to the scheme.
As far as crony capitalism is concerned, there is no difference the UPA and NDA governments' awarding policies. Where the Ambanis were the core beneficiaries in the previous regime, Adani now leads from the front.
Another emerging capitalist is Baba Ramdev - his Patanjali group crosses milestones every single day during Modi’s rule and it is a well-established fact that the self-styled yoga guru campaigned for the BJP during the 2014 general elections.
Yes, there are few things the BJP government did differently, like rechristening the Yojana Aayog as Niti Aayog, replacing JNNURM with the smart cities project, turning the Nirmal Bharat Mission into the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, Rajiv Gandhi Vidyutikaran Yojna to Deendayal Upadhyay Yojna and Rajiv Gandhi Seva Kendra to Atal Seva Kenda.
Here too the only visible change is of names and titles while the core policy remains the same.
Awarding Rajya Sabha seats 
Narendra Modi as CM of Gujarat used to target journalists of favouring the Congress so the party could offer them Rajya Sabha seats. No one can deny that the Congress did so in the past.
But the BJP is no different in this aspect too as it has accommodated industrialists, journalists and some "angry" sidelined leaders in the Rajya Sabha.
The names include Subhash Chandra (Chairman, Essar Group and owner of Zee Media), Swapan Dasgupta (senior journalist), Ramesh Poddar (industralist), Vijay Goel (sidelined Delhi leader and notorious sports minister).
Core issues of BJP
The core ideology of BJP revolves around three major issues — the construction of Ram Mandir, the removal of Article 370 and realising the Uniform Civil Code.
For the top leadership, the construction of Ram Mandir is no more an issue it has now begun repeating the Congress' line of adhering to the court’s order.
Some local leaders do mention it during election rallies, but that is merely to lure voters.
As far as the Uniform Civil Code is concerned, the BJP is silent on the subject except batting for the removal of triple talaq, which is actually a part of the very idea of UCC. But experts see this as a ploy to get Muslim women's votes.By joining hands with PDP in Jammu and Kashmir, the BJP has itself drawn the curtain over doing away with Article 370.
Not so corrupt
Modi government claims that not a single corruption case has been registered against it - unlike the previous Congress-led regime. That's true, until you dig deeper.
The way the BJP is different is that Modi government has (openly or through the backdoor) assumed control of all authorities and forced them to run as per their will. The government has even indulged in spats with Supreme Court on more than one occasion.
Several top posts are vacant, there is no sign of Lokpal and with loyalists heading agencies, it would be foolish to expect that bureaucrats report corruption in the government.
Meanwhile, chief ministers of most BJP-run states face corruption charges. Chhattisgarh CM Raman Singh is embroiled in the padding scam, MP CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan faced the brickbats in the Vyapam scam, the Rajasthan government led by Vasundhra Raje has a list of scams under its belt, including the mining scam, the LED scam, and the PHED scam.
Yes, the difference is that the Congress has failed to make the scams an issue in the respective states and at the national-level, whereas the BJP has - in the past - left no opportunity to target the Congress for corruption, successfully making it a national issue.

Note: This article was first published in DailyO.

Uniform Civil Code: A debate going around in circles

Uniform Civil Code is one of the three most controversial issues which right wingers think should be implemented while liberals see it as a threat to communal harmony of India. The other two issues are construction of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya and abolition of Article 370. All three issues are part of world’s largest party, BJP, core ideology and remain part of their election manifesto.
Uniform civil code is the proposal to replace the personal laws based on scriptures and customs of each major religious community in India with a common law. It should be distinguished from currently implemented public law. It will cover marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption and maintenance.
The Constitution of India, under Article 44, directs the government as follows: “The State shall endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.” But because of fear of losing Muslim votes, no Indian government has ever made an attempt to draft Uniform Civil Code. There are some technical contradictions as well, such as, Article 44 clashes with Article 25, assuring the freedom to propagate religion.
Currently, when India have Bhartiya Janta Party which principally supports Uniform Civil Code in power, the discussion on UCC is very much in public domain. The basic moot points are Triple Talaq, a quick divorce option for Muslim men, and polygamy, an Islamic custom which permits to have more than one wife or husband at the same time. The latter is strongly opposed by pro-Hindutva voices as they believe this a provision through which Muslims reproduce faster than Hindus and at some point Muslims could become a majority. But data suggests the incidence of polygamy is actually higher among Hindus than Muslims.
From time to time, the demand for a common civil code is renewed. This happened 30 years ago, at the time of the Shah Bano case, and it is now happening again in response to the case of Shayara Bano, who appealed to the Supreme Court to have the pernicious practice of ‘triple talaq’ abolished. And this time, the mood of country is looking less tolerant against the existing gender gaps, particularly where personal laws and religion are concerned.
The issue of Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is more about values existing within communities and not about their lifestyle and identities – that is what Tufail Ahmad, executive director of Open Source Institute, a Delhi-based think tank, feels. But that cannot be accepted as true in some senses. Almost six decades ago, The Special Marriage Act 1954 was enacted by Parliament of India to provide a special form of marriage for the people of India and all Indian nationals in foreign countries, irrespective of the religion or faith followed by either party. However since its inception, very few people have registered their marriage in accordance to that. As Indian right wingers are pushing for UCC, even they have failed to accept something similar which has already been part of Indian constitution.
When Hindu Code Bill was introduced, the extreme right wingers, who are demanding Uniform Civil Law now, actually opposed The Special Marriage Act including the then President Dr. Rajendra Prasad. The UCC has to be divided into three different parts and the problem which still persist in it is about gender justice. Also, it majorly consists of Hindu ritual which makes it unacceptable to other communities.
Same goes with Muslim acts as well, every state has its own marriage act. For instance Kashmir’s Muslim marriage act is very much different from Uttar Pradesh’s Muslim marriage act and in similar way Hyderabad’s and Madras marriage acts are different too for Muslims. And other than that, we do have different marriage acts for Christians, Persians, etc. That sjows how complicated this issue is. During the debate on this matter in the Constitution Assembly, Dr Ambedkar said “It will be foolish for any government to impose such laws against the wish of people”.
One issue which is doing rounds at public forums is about its terminology as well. Many people have recommended to call it Common Civil Code rather than Uniform Civil Code as Article 14 of our Constitution says “Un-equals cannot have same laws”, Its just like saying un-equals cannot be treated as alike and equals will be treated as alike.
This discussion is endless and it will be better if government put a draft in public domain for further discussion. It will help everyone to focus on intended points only.

Note: This article was first published in LokMarg.

Saturday, 11 March 2017

पांच राज्यों के चुनाव नतीज़ों पर मेरा मत

पांच राज्यों के चुनाव नतीज़ों पर मेरा मत-

उत्तर प्रदेश - 2 महीने पहले, प्रदेश की राजनीति में जाति की उपयोगिता पर एक लेख लिखा था लेकिन प्रदेश की जनता ने मुझे गलत साबित किया| जाति से उठकर, मोदी जी के विकास मॉडल पर अपना भरोसा जताया है| समाजवादी पार्टी को कांग्रेस से और बसपा के मुसलमान उम्मीदवारों से काफी नुकसान हुआ है| भगवा छा गया है, देखते है क्या बदलाव आता है| भाजपा के पास 2 साल हैं क्योंकि 2019 में उत्तर प्रदेश की जनता को मोदी जी को जवाब देना होगा|

पंजाब - अकाली-भाजपा के 10 साल के कुशासन को जनता ने नकार दिया है| बल्कि कैप्टेन अमरिंदर पर भरोसा जताया है, जिससे कांग्रेस को भी संजीवनी बूटी मिल गयी है| सिद्धू पाजी का निर्णय सही साबित हुआ| आम आदमी पार्टी क्यों हारी, इसकी समीक्षा करनी पड़ेगी लेकिन 2 कारण से यह अच्छा हुआ| पहला, आप का घमंड चरम पर था, अब जमीन पर आ जाएंगे| दूसरा, विपक्ष में बैठकर जनता का विश्वास जीत सकते हैं| भगवंत मान जैसों को सर ना चढ़ाये, जो अपने लोकसभा क्षेत्र में एक विधानसभा न जीत पाये, ऐसा नेता किसी काम का नहीं|

उत्तराखंड - बड़े भाई उत्तर प्रदेश के नक्शेकदम चल कर पूरा राज्य भगवा में रंग गया है| कांग्रेस की बड़ी दुर्गति हुई है| हालाँकि, जीती हुई भाजपा में काफी अवसरवादी कांग्रेसी भरे पड़े हैं|

गोवा - मनोहर पर्रिकर को दिल्ली बुलाने से भाजपा को बड़ा नुक्सान हुआ है| कांग्रेस सबसे बड़ी पार्टी जरूर बनकर उभरी है लेकिन बहुमत से दूर है| मोदी जी की कुछ और सभाएं हुई होती तो वहां भी भाजपा जीत सकती थी|

मणिपुर - 15 साल शाषन करने के बाद भी कांग्रेस सबसे बड़ी पार्टी बन गयी है लेकिन बहुमत से दूर| लेकिन यहाँ 2 रोचक घटनाएं हुई| भाजपा ने 0 से दूसरी सबसे बड़ी पार्टी बनने का सफर तय किया है| राम माधव और उनकी टीम ने बेहतरीन काम किया है| देखना रोचक होगा किसकी सरकार बनती है| लेकिन इसी के साथ अपना पूरा जीवन मणिपुर को समर्पित करने वाली 'आयरन लेडी' इरोम शर्मिला बुरी तरह चुनाव हार गयी हैं| उनके लिए दुःख महसूस कर रहा हूँ, उनके जज़्बे को सलाम|

और अब एक-एक लाइन कुछ बड़े नेताओं के लिए -

नरेंद्र मोदी - प्रधानमंत्री मोदी आज के समय में अजय हैं। जनता ने इन पर भरोसा जताया है, उम्मीद है वह उसपर खरे उतरेंगे|

अखिलेश यादव - बड़ों का अपमान करके चुनाव नहीं जीते जाते| अपनों को छोड़कर , डूबती नैया की सवारी करने का खामियाजा भुगतना पड़ा|

मायावती - इनका तो अब दलितों ने भी साथ छोड़ दिया| महलों में रहकर गरीबों की राजनीति अब नहीं चल पाएगी|

अरविन्द केजरीवाल - इनको मैं 3 सुझाव दें चाहूंगा। जमीन पर आ जाईये, सुबह शाम मोदी जाप करना बंद कीजिये और दिल्ली में काम करिये।

राहुल गांधी - यह अगर कांग्रेस और देश का भला चाहते हैं तो तुरंत राजनीति से संन्यास ले लें|